Evidence, Retaliation & The Human Cost of Speaking out

This page brings together documentation, analysis, and supporting material relating to protected disclosures made in the context of the Irish Banking Inquiry.  At the center of this material is a key question:  

Why were certain Central Bank disclosures not examined during the inquiry process?

The content presented here explores:

• The original disclosures were publicly validated shortly after the reviewer’s report
• The reviewer’s report and responses to it
• Evidence and analysis that challenge that report
• The broader consequences of decisions taken during and after the inquiry are evident in the courts in our opinion

Section 10 is particularly significant, as it examines issues relating to the Central Bank disclosures and their significance in relation to the fact they were not reviewed!

These issues have ongoing relevance. Many observers point to their potential connection with later developments, including outcomes in the courts and impacts on businesses, investments, and livelihoods. This page is structured to allow readers to review the documentation and supporting analysis and in support of all Irish Whistleblowers contains a video describing the Human Cost of Speaking Out.